Case Study
$4,500 in Paid Ads Created a Projected $49,500 in Profit
Paid ads with a clear profitable business outcome, not just generating traffic or leads.
Client name and identifying details have been changed at the client’s request.
The challenge
Maison & Co. was founded by a former nanny who identified a genuine market gap: busy households that no longer needed childcare but still needed in-home support with meals, laundry, and keeping the home running. The concept was strong. The execution was working. But growth had hit a ceiling.
The founder was understandably reluctant to commit meaningful marketing spend before she could see the math. For the first few years, she relied on networking, referrals, and organic reach. That got her to a point, but not past it. The core problem was a leaky bucket: she was gaining and losing clients at roughly the same rate, staying flat despite real effort.
Two things made this more nuanced than a typical service business. First, what Maison & Co. offered wasn’t mainstream: it sat in a hybrid space between luxury and accessible, which required thoughtful audience targeting to reach the right households. Second, like many early-stage service businesses, the service mix evolved as the founder learned what clients valued most. That adaptability is a strength, and part of our work was building marketing infrastructure that could flex alongside it.
When rapid growth became necessary, organic channels alone couldn’t deliver it fast enough. Paid ads entered the conversation, and with them, the fear that comes with spending real money during a period of uncertainty.
What we built
The engagement evolved in phases as trust and results compounded.
Phase 1: Paid ads foundation. We launched with Google and Meta campaigns to start generating traffic and testing which audiences and service lines converted. This gave us real performance data to work with rather than assumptions.
Phase 2: Organic social and community. We layered in organic social media and targeted posting in Facebook groups to build awareness beyond her existing network, reaching people who matched the profile but had never heard of the brand.
Phase 3: Monthly newsletters. An email channel to keep past clients warm, reduce churn, and re-engage lapsed customers, addressing the leaky bucket directly.
Phase 4: SEO and landing page architecture. When the timing was right, we moved into SEO. We built out a more complete website with dedicated landing pages for each service offering, all interlinked. This created an owned-asset foundation that didn’t require ongoing spend to maintain.
Phase 5: Coordinated paid campaigns. With the landing page infrastructure in place, we launched a more precise and intentional paid Meta and Google Ads strategy, each ad now landing on a purpose-built page rather than a generic homepage.
The data-led decision
The turning point wasn’t a campaign, it was a conversation. When the founder said “I need to double my clients in the next two months, what should the strategy be?”, the answer started with the existing funnel data, not with a pitch for more spend.
We pulled 90 days of actual performance:
- 800 landing page visits
- 300 visitors clicked to the lead form (38%)
- 40 completed the form (13%)
- 20% of form completions became paying clients
- 8 new clients total — a 1% visitor-to-client conversion rate
The funnel wasn’t broken. It just wasn’t seeing enough traffic. To hit 10 new clients per month at a 1% conversion rate, she needed 1,000 landing page visits per month, nearly 4x the existing average of 267/month.
Then we ran the economics:
- Historical CPC: $1.22
- 1,000 clicks × $1.22 = $1,220/month in ad spend
- 10 clients acquired = $122 cost per client (CAC)
- First-month profit per client: $500
- Break-even: just 3 clients per month covered the entire ad spend
The real risk wasn’t spending $1,500/month. It was not scaling when the numbers clearly supported it.
The results
We ran a 3-month paid ads test at $1,500/month across Google and Meta. Here’s what changed:
| Metric | Before paid ads | After paid ads |
| Landing page visits | 700 (267/mo avg) | 1,700 (467/mo avg) |
| Completed lead forms | 37 | 91 |
| New clients | 8 (1% conv. rate) | 18 (1.2% conv. rate) |
| Ad spend | — | $4,500 (3 months) |
| Cost per client | — | ~$250 |
| Revenue generated | — | $9,000 (month one) |
| Profit after ad costs | — | $4,500 (month one) |
The real win: lifetime value
Month-one profit tells part of the story. Most clients commit to 3-month contracts and stay an average of 6 months. Modeled against the same $4,500 in ad spend:
| Timeframe | Revenue | Profit after ads |
| Month one | $9,000 | $4,500 |
| 3-month contracts | $27,000 | $22,500 |
| 6-month avg. retention | $54,000 | $49,500 |
The non-obvious part
The most important work in this engagement wasn’t the ad campaigns. It was building the infrastructure that made the campaigns defensible: landing pages for each service, interlinked and optimized, so every dollar of ad spend landed somewhere purposeful.
And the most important conversation wasn’t a pitch. It was building the case with real data so the founder could make a confident decision, not a leap of faith. When the numbers support it, scaling becomes the obvious move.
Maison & Co. is still a CDM client almost 4 years later. The engagement that started with a single paid ads question in 2022 now spans paid search, paid social, organic social, email, and SEO: a full marketing stack built incrementally, at a pace that matched the business as it grew.
Ready to build results like these?
Let’s talk about what’s possible for your business.
Start the conversation →